He Banned Your Guns, Then Hired 150 Armed Officers to Protect Himself With $30 Million Tax Dollars

Published on April 5, 2026
Duration: 6:13

This video critiques the perceived hypocrisy of politicians advocating for stricter gun control while utilizing extensive armed security. It highlights the contrast between public restrictions on firearm ownership and the armed protection afforded to figures like Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden. The core argument posits that these politicians are not anti-gun, but rather anti-public gun ownership, prioritizing their own safety through armed means.

Quick Summary

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's security detail of up to 150 armed officers costs $30 million annually, a stark contrast to his support for firearm bans. This highlights a perceived hypocrisy where politicians prioritize their own armed protection while restricting public access to firearms.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Mayor Johnson's Security Detail & Cost
  2. 00:52Illinois Assault Weapons Ban
  3. 01:29Defining 'Weapons of War'
  4. 01:31Justice Thomas on AR-15
  5. 02:07The Practical Message to Residents
  6. 02:44The 'Guns for Me, Not for Thee' Playbook
  7. 02:52Hillary Clinton's Stance
  8. 03:20Joe Biden's Security Detail
  9. 03:40Chicago's Violence Despite Gun Control
  10. 04:07Government's Duty to Protect
  11. 04:33The Militia Collection
  12. 05:03Key Takeaway for Viewers
  13. 05:41Share This Video

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's security detail so large and expensive?

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is protected by an armed security detail of up to 150 Chicago Police Department officers. This extensive protection costs taxpayers approximately $30 million annually, a figure highlighted in contrast to his support for firearm restrictions.

What is the argument regarding politicians and gun control hypocrisy?

The argument is that politicians who advocate for stricter gun control for the public often surround themselves with heavily armed security details, creating a double standard. This suggests they prioritize their own safety with firearms while restricting others' access.

What did Justice Clarence Thomas say about the AR-15?

Justice Clarence Thomas stated that the AR-15 is a civilian weapon, not a military one. He emphasized that no army in the world uses a service rifle that is only semi-automatic, challenging the 'weapon of war' classification often applied to it.

Does the government have a legal duty to protect citizens?

According to the Supreme Court ruling in Castle Rock v. Gonzalez, the police are not legally obligated to protect individual citizens. This legal precedent is cited to contrast with the extensive protection provided to public officials.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →