The Truth Behind Remington's $73 Million Settlement With Sandy Hook Survivors

Published on February 17, 2022
Duration: 11:51

Colion Noir provides an expert analysis of the Remington settlement with Sandy Hook survivors, detailing the legal strategies employed, particularly the bypass of PLCAA through Connecticut's unfair trade practices law. He highlights the financial realities of the firearms industry and the role of insurance companies in the settlement, questioning the stated motivations versus the actual outcomes for the industry.

Quick Summary

The $73 million settlement between Remington and Sandy Hook survivors was achieved by bypassing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) through a legal strategy focusing on Connecticut's unfair trade practices law, arguing Remington's AR-15 marketing was irresponsible. The settlement was primarily funded by insurance companies, highlighting the financial vulnerabilities of the firearms industry to prolonged litigation.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Remington Sandy Hook Settlement Overview
  2. 01:16Plaintiffs' Attorney Motivations and Fees
  3. 02:00PLCAA and Legal Immunity Myths
  4. 03:00The Connecticut Advertising Loophole
  5. 04:38Gun Industry Financial Realities
  6. 06:33Insurance Companies Forced the Settlement
  7. 08:45Settlement vs. Forcing Industry Change

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the Sandy Hook lawsuit bypass the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)?

The lawsuit bypassed PLCAA by arguing that Remington's marketing of the AR-15 in Connecticut constituted an unfair trade practice under state law, a specific exception that the Connecticut Supreme Court allowed to proceed.

Who primarily funded the $73 million settlement between Remington and Sandy Hook survivors?

The settlement was largely funded by insurance companies, not directly by the firearms industry itself, as Remington Outdoor Company had already undergone bankruptcy proceedings and its assets were sold.

What was the alleged marketing issue with Remington's AR-15 in the Sandy Hook case?

Plaintiffs argued that Remington's advertising irresponsibly targeted young men, portraying the AR-15 as a 'killing machine,' which was deemed an unfair trade practice under Connecticut state law.

What is the financial reality of the firearms industry that makes it vulnerable to lawsuits?

The firearms industry has relatively low profit margins compared to other sectors. For instance, Ruger's entire market capitalization is significantly less than the weekly profits of tech giants like Google, making prolonged litigation a potent tactic.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →