Court Rules You Don't Need AR-15s For Self Defense
This analysis by Colion Noir, an expert in firearms law and advocacy, dissects a Connecticut court ruling that AR-15s may not be considered necessary for self-defense. Noir critically examines the court's interpretation of the Second Amendment, arguing against the government's authority to define 'sufficient' self-defense tools and highlighting the deceptive comparison of AR-15s to fully automatic weapons. The ruling's potential to set a dangerous national precedent is emphasized, reinforcing the idea that ordinary citizens constitute the militia envisioned by the Founders.









