DOJ Turns on Democrat State — Says Gun Ban Violates the 2nd Amendment

Published on February 2, 2026
Duration: 8:43

This entry details the DOJ's amicus brief challenging Massachusetts' handgun ban, arguing it violates the Second Amendment. The brief, filed in the Granata v. Campbell case, asserts that the state's approved firearms roster unconstitutionally restricts firearms in common use, citing Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen. The DOJ emphasizes that constitutional rights must be exercisable within the state, directly addressing the state's argument about purchasing firearms elsewhere.

Quick Summary

The DOJ has challenged Massachusetts' handgun ban, arguing its approved firearms roster violates the Second Amendment. In the Granata v. Campbell case, the DOJ asserts that banning firearms in common use, like many Glock models, is unconstitutional, citing Supreme Court precedents and emphasizing that constitutional rights must be exercisable within the state.

Chapters

  1. 00:00DOJ Amicus Brief in Massachusetts
  2. 01:19Granata v. Campbell Case Details
  3. 02:55Constitutional Arguments
  4. 05:49Glock Handguns and Market Data

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DOJ's stance on Massachusetts' handgun ban?

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an amicus brief challenging Massachusetts' handgun ban, arguing that the state's 'approved firearms roster' violates the Second Amendment by prohibiting firearms commonly owned by Americans in other states.

What is the Granata v. Campbell case about?

The Granata v. Campbell case involves plaintiffs, including a Massachusetts gun owner, a retailer, and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), challenging the state's roster system. This system requires government pre-approval for handgun sales, preventing licensed stores from selling models not on the list, even if legal elsewhere.

How does the DOJ's brief address the 'common use' principle?

The DOJ's brief emphasizes that governments cannot ban firearms in common use, citing Supreme Court rulings like Heller and Bruen. It argues that Massachusetts' restriction on common firearms like many Glock models is unconstitutional.

Can constitutional rights be exercised by purchasing firearms in other states?

No, the DOJ argues that constitutional rights are not 'second-class' and must be exercisable within the state. The state's argument that residents can simply buy banned guns elsewhere is rejected.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →