Duncan Is About to Break a Supreme Court Record

The US Supreme Court denied certiorari in United States v. Cockerham, a case involving a felony conviction for failing to pay child support and its impact on Second Amendment rights. This decision, authored by Fifth Circuit Judge James Ho, suggests the Supreme Court is moving away from hearing cases with problematic fact patterns involving criminals, favoring those with law-abiding citizens. The denial is seen as a positive signal for Second Amendment jurisprudence, potentially indicating a trend towards protecting the rights of individuals not associated with criminal activity.

A recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. DeBora has established binding precedent stating that firearm suppressors are considered accessories, not 'arms,' and therefore do not fall under the plain text of the Second Amendment. This ruling significantly impacts gun owners within the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction, potentially affecting future legal challenges, including the ongoing Sanchez v. Bonta case concerning California's ban on silencers. The decision emphasizes a textualist approach, questioning whether an accessory is necessary for the ordinary operation of a weapon.

This video discusses a significant Supreme Court ruling that overturned a Trump DOJ policy attempting to restrict firearm rights for individuals who use marijuana. The court unanimously ruled against the DOJ's interpretation of the 'habitual drunkard' standard, emphasizing that personal choices, even those not universally approved, should not be grounds for disarming law-abiding citizens. The ruling reinforces the principle that constitutional rights, like the Second Amendment, are protections, not mere permissions.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in United States v. Harrison, which addresses whether marijuana use disqualifies individuals from firearm ownership. The ruling clarifies that past or occasional marijuana use does not automatically make someone a prohibited person under federal law, aligning with the Second Amendment's historical context. The decision emphasizes that the government must prove current, habitual impairment to restrict firearm rights.

This video provides an expert breakdown of the Supreme Court's unanimous 9-0 decision in US v. Armani. The ruling establishes that regular marijuana use, by itself, is not sufficient grounds to revoke an individual's Second Amendment rights under federal law (18 USC 922(g)(3)). The analysis emphasizes the importance of the Bruin methodology, requiring the government to demonstrate a historical tradition of firearm regulation analogous to modern laws. The decision is hailed as a significant victory for gun rights advocates, reinforcing that individuals can only be disarmed if they pose a violent danger to themselves or others, and highlighting the necessity of pre-deprivation due process.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's denial of the NSSF v. James case, which challenged New York's attempt to circumvent the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). The PLCAA generally shields firearm manufacturers from lawsuits over third-party misuse of their products. The denial allows New York's interpretation of nuisance laws to stand, potentially enabling suits against the firearms industry and setting a concerning precedent for other states. The speaker expresses frustration with the Supreme Court's perceived disregard for Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron Doctrine, which previously granted deference to federal agencies' interpretations of statutes. CRPA President Chuck Michelle explains how this impacts agencies like the ATF, potentially limiting their ability to enact regulations without clear statutory authority. The discussion also covers recent SCOTUS decisions on Second Amendment cases, including the denial of cert in Illinois gun ban cases and the GVR (Grant, Vacate, Remand) of cases in light of the Rahimi decision, signaling a shift in how gun rights litigation may proceed.

This video discusses President Trump's executive order aimed at reviewing and potentially reversing actions that may infringe upon Second Amendment rights. Rick Travis, CRPA Legislative Director, breaks down the order's implications, focusing on the Attorney General's role in examining regulations, particularly those concerning 'ghost guns' (DIY firearm kits) and age restrictions. The discussion also touches upon the potential impact of the order on existing Second Amendment lawsuits and the role of state governments in challenging federal actions.

This video provides an expert overview of key California firearm laws and regulations taking effect in 2025 and beyond, presented by attorney Matt Cabero. It details changes to firearm storage requirements, the impact of the ammunition tax, and updates to CCW permit processes. The discussion highlights the efforts of organizations like CRPA in shaping legislation and regulatory outcomes.

This video discusses two lawsuits challenging California laws that prohibit firearm, ammunition, and precursor part sales on state-owned properties, specifically targeting gun shows at the Del Mar Fairgrounds and OC Fair and Event Center. The discussion highlights the legal arguments presented at the Ninth Circuit, including First and Second Amendment claims, and the differing outcomes in the lower courts. It also touches upon the perceived bias of the judicial panel and the strategic considerations in arguing such cases.