HUGE NEWS- 9th Circuit Ruling on Open Carry - The Legal Brief

Published on August 8, 2018
Duration: 10:58

This Legal Brief from TheGunCollective, hosted by Adam Kraut, Esq., analyzes a significant Ninth Circuit ruling on open carry rights. The court affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry a firearm openly for self-defense, deeming Hawaii's restrictive licensing requirements unconstitutional. The ruling has broad implications for states within the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction.

Quick Summary

The Ninth Circuit ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry a firearm openly for self-defense. The court found Hawaii's restrictive licensing requirements for open carry to be unconstitutional, as they unduly burdened this core Second Amendment right for law-abiding citizens.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Ninth Circuit Open Carry Ruling
  2. 00:21Sponsor Segment: SB Tactical Braces
  3. 00:53Ninth Circuit Jurisdiction & Case Background
  4. 01:29Hawaii Carry Licensing Requirements
  5. 02:31George Young v. Hawaii County Case
  6. 03:26Ninth Circuit Constitutional Test Explained
  7. 03:57Defining the Right to 'Bear' Arms
  8. 04:43Historical Legal Inquiry on Carrying Firearms
  9. 06:21Rejection of Dissenting Legal Arguments
  10. 07:44Analysis of Hawaii's Restrictive Laws
  11. 08:24Final Ruling: Open Carry is a Protected Right
  12. 08:56Future Legal Pathways and Implications

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Ninth Circuit rule regarding open carry?

The Ninth Circuit ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to carry a firearm openly for self-defense. The court found Hawaii's restrictive licensing requirements for open carry to be unconstitutional, as they unduly burdened this core Second Amendment right for law-abiding citizens.

What is the significance of the Ninth Circuit's ruling on open carry?

This ruling is significant because it affirms the constitutional right to open carry for self-defense, rejecting restrictive licensing schemes. It has direct implications for all states within the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction, potentially leading to broader access to open carry permits.

How did the Ninth Circuit interpret the Second Amendment in relation to open carry?

The court analyzed historical legal precedents, including Heller and McDonald, to define the right to 'bear' arms as carrying for offensive or defensive action. They concluded that a historical right to publicly carry firearms for self-defense existed at the nation's founding.

What are the potential next steps after the Ninth Circuit's open carry ruling?

Following the Ninth Circuit's decision, potential next steps include an en banc hearing where the full court reconsiders the case, or a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court for review. These actions could further solidify or challenge the ruling's impact.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from TheGunCollective

View all →