MrColionNoir: NY Newspaper Publishes Permit Holders Names & Address Response

Published on January 10, 2013
Duration: 2:06

Colion Noir critically analyzes the New York newspaper's decision to publish the names and addresses of concealed carry permit holders, deeming it a dangerous and counterproductive act. He argues this exposes law-abiding citizens to increased risk of home invasion and harassment, while highlighting the hypocrisy of the newspaper hiring armed security after the publication. The expert instructor emphasizes the importance of protecting Second Amendment rights and focusing on actual criminals.

Quick Summary

A New York newspaper's decision to publish concealed carry permit holders' names and addresses is criticized as a dangerous failure, potentially creating target lists for criminals and increasing home invasion risks. This action is seen as a tactic to harass gun owners, highlighting hypocrisy when the newspaper itself hires armed security.

Chapters

  1. 00:00NY Newspaper Fails
  2. 00:11Dangerous Implications for Residents
  3. 00:27Anti-Gunner Harassment Tactic
  4. 00:35Increased Risk of Home Invasion
  5. 01:00Second Amendment Disregarded
  6. 01:15Irony of Newspaper Security
  7. 01:36Lives at Stake, CCW Holders Not Criminals
  8. 01:52Focus on Real Criminals

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is publishing concealed carry permit holders' names and addresses considered dangerous?

Publishing this information can expose law-abiding citizens to criminals, creating a target list for gun theft and home invasions. It increases the risk for both gun owners and non-gun owners by indicating who might have a firearm and who might not.

What is the perceived motive behind the NY newspaper's decision?

The decision is seen by critics as a tactic to harass gun owners, stemming from an anti-gun agenda that wrongly identifies concealed carry holders as the problem. The intent is perceived as punitive rather than safety-oriented.

How does the newspaper's hiring of armed security highlight hypocrisy?

The newspaper, after publishing information that allegedly endangers citizens, then hires armed security to protect themselves. This action is viewed as a stark example of hypocrisy, demonstrating a lack of concern for the safety of others while prioritizing their own.

What is the argument regarding the Second Amendment rights?

The argument is that exercising Second Amendment rights is unfairly demonized, contrasting with the strong protection afforded to other rights like free speech or voting. This creates a baffling double standard where self-defense is seen as inherently negative.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →