Tom Gresham's GUNTALK: 6.21.15 - Part B

Published on June 25, 2015
Duration: 44:45

Representative Ron DeSantis discusses HR 2710, a bill aimed at redefining 'sporting purpose' in firearm regulations to 'lawful purpose.' This change would prevent the ATF from banning firearms or ammunition based on subjective interpretations of sporting use, shifting the burden of proof to Congress to legislate specific prohibitions. The bill seeks to clarify legislative intent and prevent executive overreach in Second Amendment rights, with bipartisan support anticipated.

Quick Summary

HR 2710 aims to protect Second Amendment rights by redefining 'sporting purpose' to 'lawful purpose,' preventing the ATF from arbitrarily banning firearms and ammunition. This legislative change ensures that items used legally are not restricted based on subjective interpretations, shifting the focus to specific Congressional prohibitions rather than executive overreach.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Crimson Trace Laser Sighting Ad
  2. 00:24Welcome to Gun Talk
  3. 01:06New GunTalk App: Gundelo
  4. 01:31South Carolina Shooting & Gun Control Debate
  5. 02:54Rep. Ron DeSantis on HR 2710
  6. 03:53HR 2710: Sporting Purpose vs. Lawful Purpose
  7. 05:03Congress Stepping Up Enforcement
  8. 05:42Support for HR 2710
  9. 06:52ATF's Role and Interpretation
  10. 07:13ATF's Stance on Target Shooting
  11. 08:13Likelihood of HR 2710 Passing
  12. 09:09What HR 2710 Law Says
  13. 09:51Contact Your Congressman
  14. 10:45HR 2710 is Fabulous News
  15. 11:06Father's Day Call-In
  16. 11:38Smith & Wesson Bodyguard Ad
  17. 12:00Concealed Carry Training DVDs Ad
  18. 12:30Brownells Edge Membership Ad
  19. 13:01CrossBreed Holsters Ad
  20. 13:45Father's Day Call-In: Josh
  21. 14:43Violence Policy Center Criticism
  22. 15:19Self-Defense Gun Use Statistics
  23. 17:21National Crime Victimization Study Issues
  24. 19:08Call-In: Buddy from Texas
  25. 19:45Tom Gresham's Father & Background
  26. 20:27Buddy Returns to Call
  27. 20:36Buddy's Praise and Personal Story
  28. 21:41Gun Ownership Statistics & Misuse
  29. 22:44Gun Talk Weekly Broadcast
  30. 22:54Call-In: Brian from Virginia Beach
  31. 23:41Gun Control Debate & Emotional State
  32. 24:14Goal of Debates: Not to Win
  33. 25:14Engaging in Conversation with Questions
  34. 27:06Feeling Safe vs. Being Safe
  35. 29:27Making Your Family Safer
  36. 29:56Timney Triggers Ad
  37. 30:28Concealed Carry Training DVDs Ad
  38. 30:58Laser Trainer Target Ad
  39. 31:26Tom Gresham on Coastal Land Loss
  40. 32:30WhereToShoot.org Resource
  41. 33:09President's Comments on Mass Murders
  42. 33:40Ideas for Personal & Family Safety
  43. 33:54Things You Can Say & Do
  44. 35:53Things You Can Buy: Training
  45. 36:49Training DVDs from GunTalkShop.com
  46. 37:30Call-In: Joe from Louisiana
  47. 37:37Call-In: Carl from Baton Rouge
  48. 38:23Stopping Attackers Historically
  49. 39:17Two Different Church Shootings
  50. 40:31New Life Church Shooting Stopped by Armed Citizen
  51. 41:08Charleston vs. Colorado Springs Outcomes
  52. 42:29Media Coverage of Armed Citizen Interventions
  53. 43:06Mindset: Sheep vs. Sheepdogs
  54. 43:44Commitment to Training
  55. 44:18Guest Who Changes People's Lives

Frequently Asked Questions

What is HR 2710 and its purpose?

HR 2710 is a bill aimed at protecting Second Amendment rights by changing the interpretation of 'sporting purpose' to 'lawful purpose.' This prevents the ATF from banning firearms or ammunition based on subjective sporting definitions, ensuring items used legally are not arbitrarily restricted.

How does the ATF use the term 'sporting purpose' to restrict firearms?

The ATF has historically used the undefined term 'sporting purpose' to ban or restrict the importation and sale of firearms and ammunition. By claiming items are not for sporting use, they can effectively prohibit them, bypassing clear legislative intent.

What is the difference between 'feeling safe' and 'being safe' in the context of gun control?

'Feeling safe' often comes from enacting laws that provide a sense of action, even if they don't improve actual safety. 'Being safe' requires taking concrete steps, such as acquiring training and understanding threats, to genuinely reduce risk.

Why are gun-free zones considered ineffective?

Gun-free zones are often ineffective because they disarm law-abiding citizens, making them vulnerable targets for criminals and mass murderers who know these areas lack armed resistance. They can become de facto targets for those intending harm.

What is the significance of the 'lawful purpose' amendment in HR 2710?

The 'lawful purpose' amendment shifts the regulatory paradigm. Instead of assuming firearms are illegal unless proven for sport, it presumes legality for any lawful use, requiring Congress to specifically ban items rather than relying on executive agency interpretation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Talk Media

View all →