How Water Proof is Live Ammo?? (Submerged For a MONTH)

This YouTube video, titled "How Water Proof is Live Ammo?! (Part 2) *Submerged For 2 MONTHS*", investigates the durability of live ammunition when submerged underwater for an extended period of two months. The creator documents the process and reveals whether the ammunition remains functional after such exposure. The description also includes affiliate links for electronic hearing protection and other camera gear, along with links to support the channel via Patreon and PayPal, and a link to their Instagram page.

This video presents an "Ammo Torture Test" focusing on how ammunition withstands submersion and deformation. While specific firearms or calibers are not detailed in the provided information, the core concept revolves around testing the durability and reliability of ammunition under adverse conditions, suggesting a practical evaluation for firearm owners and enthusiasts.

This video, titled "Does Oil ruin Ammo? PT.4 🛢🤔", appears to be an experimental investigation into the effects of oil on ammunition. The description includes hashtags related to experiments, firearms safety, gun safety, and durability, suggesting a practical, hands-on approach to testing. It also references "airsoft" and "cod" which might indicate comparisons or related content, though the core focus is likely on the ammunition experiment itself. The series format (PT.4) implies previous parts likely covered similar or related aspects of this topic.

This video tests a custom-made, 12-pound solid titanium Captain America shield against live .45 ACP ammunition. Jerry Miculek demonstrates rapid-fire shooting at a ballistic dummy protected by the shield. The test confirms the shield's effectiveness, stopping all eight rounds with minimal deformation, leaving the dummy unharmed.

This video rigorously tests the self-defense capabilities of various airguns against a realistic human head ballistic target. The expert instructor demonstrates that low-power BB guns like the Daisy Red Rider offer minimal threat, while even full-auto CO2 BB guns fail to penetrate the skull. However, a high-velocity Gamo pellet rifle proves capable of causing significant damage, cracking the skull. The instructor concludes that BB guns are unsuitable for self-defense, and while pellet rifles are dangerous, they lack the immediate stopping power of conventional firearms.

This video tests the BulletSafe VP3 Level IIIA vest against various calibers up to .44 Magnum using a realistic human torso dummy. While the vest stopped all tested rounds, including a .44 Magnum and 12-gauge buckshot, significant backface deformation and blunt force trauma were evident, especially with higher-energy rounds. The dummy's shoulder blade was broken by buckshot, and severe bruising was indicated by the .44 Magnum impact.

This review of the Crosman DPMS SBR full-auto BB gun highlights its realistic AR-15 SBR aesthetics and select-fire capability. The host demonstrates its operation, including loading with a speedloader and the dual CO2 power system. Performance metrics like 1400 RPM and 430 FPS are discussed, along with its accuracy and destructive potential on targets like watermelons. The device is recommended for realistic training or plinking where live firearms are impractical.

This video tests the effectiveness and dangers of using a flare gun for self-defense. While a flare gun can ignite materials and cause internal damage to a ballistic torso, its single-shot capacity, slow reload, and high risk of starting fires make it an irresponsible and dangerous choice for defense. The test highlights the unpredictable nature and significant fire hazard associated with using flare guns in a defensive scenario.