The boycott has grown in the last 10 days

Published on December 29, 2023
Duration: 5:49

This video discusses the growing boycott within USPSA, initiated after the removal of Area 3 Director Scott Arnberg. Clubs and sections are considering withholding participation or switching to alternative shooting sports like Hit Factor or PCSC. The speaker highlights that while financial contributions might not significantly harm USPSA, the psychological impact of reduced participation and withheld funds can pressure the board towards change. The focus is on members actively pushing back to reclaim the organization for its membership.

Quick Summary

The USPSA boycott, spurred by Scott Arnberg's removal, involves clubs withholding participation or switching to sports like Hit Factor/PCSC. This tactic aims to pressure the USPSA board by demonstrating member dissatisfaction and demanding organizational change, rather than solely impacting finances.

Chapters

  1. 00:02Introduction: USPSA Boycott Update
  2. 00:05Scott Arnberg's Removal and Impact
  3. 00:16Club and Section Discussions
  4. 00:43Boycott Options: Withholding Events, Switching Sports
  5. 01:05Practical Shooting Insights Map
  6. 01:45Why the Boycott is Good: Pushing Back
  7. 02:18The Power of Withholding Funds
  8. 02:24Questioning USPSA Affiliation Benefits
  9. 03:09Frustration in Area 3
  10. 03:35Impact on USPSA Organization
  11. 04:17Money vs. Behavior Change
  12. 04:43Strengthening Shooting Sports
  13. 05:00Match Director's Strategy
  14. 05:19Demanding Change from USPSA
  15. 05:36Conclusion: Boycott Continues

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the USPSA boycott and why is it happening?

The USPSA boycott is a movement where clubs and sections are considering withholding participation or switching to other shooting sports. It gained momentum after the removal of Area 3 Director Scott Arnberg, with members aiming to reclaim the organization for its membership and push for changes in management and treatment of participants.

What are the main alternatives being considered by USPSA clubs during the boycott?

Clubs participating in the USPSA boycott are exploring several alternatives. These include completely ceasing USPSA events, switching to shooting sports like Hit Factor or PCSC, or running a reduced number of USPSA events primarily for classification purposes before shifting to other formats.

What is the perceived impact of the USPSA boycott on the organization?

While the financial impact of withheld membership fees might be small, the boycott's psychological effect is considered significant. It serves as a powerful message to the USPSA board, encouraging them to address member concerns and potentially leading to behavioral changes within the organization.

How does the USPSA boycott aim to influence the organization's management?

The boycott aims to influence USPSA management by demonstrating member dissatisfaction and a willingness to withdraw support. By withholding participation and funds, members are pressuring the board to acknowledge their concerns about how the organization is run and how members are treated, demanding a change in leadership or policy.

More Range & Competition Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →