Editorial Boards Continue to Mislead on Multiple Sales Reporting

The EPA has denied a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity seeking to ban traditional ammunition, citing a lack of jurisdiction under the Toxic Substances Control Act. This marks the second denial for similar petitions, with the EPA stating the latest filing was essentially identical to a previous one. Legislation, specifically HR 4089, the Sportsman's Heritage Act of 2012, is being advanced to further clarify that the EPA cannot regulate ammunition components.

This video discusses a significant legal victory for gun owners and hunters, stemming from a lawsuit dismissed by the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. The case involved the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RICRA) and allegations against the US Forest Service for allowing lead ammunition use in Kaibab National Forest. Expert analysis highlights the ruling's implications for the Second Amendment and potential parallels to gun company liability.

The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) is intervening in a lawsuit aiming to ban traditional lead ammunition. This marks the latest in a series of attempts by environmental groups to have the EPA prohibit lead ammunition, despite previous denials and court rulings. The NSSF highlights the potential devastating impact on wildlife conservation, hunters, shooters, law enforcement, and the military, citing a projected 190% price increase for ammunition. Concurrently, legislation like the Sportsman's Act is being advanced to clarify the EPA's lack of jurisdiction over ammunition.

This video discusses the National Shooting Sports Foundation's (NSSF) response to a New York Times editorial concerning the EPA's potential regulation of ammunition. Larry Keane, NSSF General Counsel, explains that legislation (S. 838 and H.R. 1558) aims to clarify that the EPA lacks jurisdiction over firearms and ammunition, a stance previously upheld by the EPA itself. The NSSF argues that attempts to ban lead ammunition components by environmental groups like the Center for Biodiversity are a pretext to ban hunting and shooting sports, which would devastate wildlife conservation funding derived from excise taxes on ammunition.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has opened a public comment period, ending October 31st, on a petition from the Center for Biological Diversity to ban traditional ammunition under the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. This action could impact hunters, target shooters, and law enforcement. The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) urges gun owners to voice their opposition, emphasizing that ammunition is already exempt from this act and contributes to wildlife conservation funding.

A federal court has unanimously rejected an attempt by environmental groups to ban lead ammunition in Arizona's Kaibab National Forest. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the US Forest Service is not liable under RCRA for failing to regulate lead ammunition use by hunters, citing that mere ownership and the choice not to regulate do not constitute active control. This decision is a significant win for hunters and gun rights organizations.

This video features Dom Raso, a former U.S. Navy SEAL, critically analyzing political figures' use of military service for self-promotion. Raso dissects claims made by Hillary Clinton regarding her experiences in Bosnia, contrasting them with archival footage and his own combat experiences to highlight discrepancies and the importance of accountability in leadership. The core message emphasizes that misrepresenting military heroism for political gain disqualifies individuals from holding high office.

This entry synthesizes insights from armed citizens Jack Wilson and Stephen Willeford, who stopped mass shooters. It details their experiences, critiques proposed gun control measures by Joe Biden, and emphasizes the importance of Second Amendment rights. The content highlights real-world application of firearms for self-defense and the political landscape surrounding gun ownership.

This video from the NRA emphasizes the importance of defending Second Amendment rights against perceived threats. Featuring NRA leadership and public figures like Donald Trump Jr., it frames gun ownership as integral to freedom and personal safety. The content serves as a call to action for members to actively support the NRA's advocacy efforts against gun control initiatives.

This video discusses the case of Austin Tong, a Fordham University student charged with a hate crime for posting a picture of an AR-15 on Instagram. The university's disciplinary actions, including probation and mandatory training, are detailed, alongside Tong's defense based on Second Amendment rights and free speech. The NRA and 'Students for 2A' are noted as supporting Tong's stance against what he perceives as 'leftist academic elitism.'