Government Regulated Silencers, Now We’re Deaf! Time to Sue.

Published on April 23, 2026
Duration: 21:58

This video argues that the US government's regulation of firearm suppressors, stemming from the 1934 National Firearms Act, has led to widespread hearing damage among law-abiding gun owners. It details the history of suppressors as safety devices invented by Hiram Percy Maxim and criticizes the NFA's $200 tax and subsequent regulatory hurdles as a means to limit access rather than collect revenue. While acknowledging the recent elimination of the tax stamp, the video asserts that suppressors remain overly regulated, hindering their accessibility as intended safety equipment.

Quick Summary

Firearm suppressors, invented by Hiram Percy Maxim, were originally safety devices that also reduced recoil. However, the 1934 National Firearms Act imposed a $200 tax, making them difficult to obtain. While the tax is being eliminated in 2026, suppressors remain NFA items, requiring registration and government approval, which critics argue is a means of control rather than public safety.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Class Action Lawsuit Idea
  2. 00:15Instagram Post Sparking the Idea
  3. 01:43Personal Experience with Hearing Damage
  4. 02:25Understanding Tinnitus
  5. 03:10Hearing Damage from Legal Hunting
  6. 03:34Using Suppressors and Hearing Protection
  7. 04:55Government Hypocrisy: Car Mufflers vs. Gun Suppressors
  8. 05:52New York's SLEEP Act
  9. 06:21Sponsor Segment: Checkmate Magazines
  10. 07:43History of the Suppressor
  11. 07:53Hiram Percy Maxim's Invention
  12. 09:06The Maxim Silencer
  13. 09:44Early Subsonic Ammunition
  14. 10:00Demonstration to the US Army
  15. 10:13Suppressors as Normal Items
  16. 10:36Suppressors as Hearing Protection
  17. 10:45Recoil Reduction Benefits
  18. 11:02The National Firearms Act (NFA)
  19. 11:20NFA's Purpose: Taxation to Limit Access
  20. 12:11NFA's Origins and Intent
  21. 12:48NFA Sweeps in Other Items
  22. 13:34Hollywood's Influence on Suppressor Perception
  23. 14:15Real Decibel Levels of Suppressed Firearms
  24. 14:41Legislating Based on Movies
  25. 14:55Suppressors and Mass Shootings
  26. 15:13Virginia Beach Shooting Analysis
  27. 15:35Expert Opinions on Suppressor Lethality
  28. 16:07Associated Press Report Consensus
  29. 16:50Virginia Beach Police Chief's Statement
  30. 18:00Can We Sue the Government?
  31. 18:08Sovereign Immunity
  32. 18:17The Case for Negligence
  33. 19:13Good News: Tax Stamp Elimination
  34. 19:19The Catch: Registry Remains
  35. 20:05Power vs. Money
  36. 20:15Registration as a Path to Confiscation
  37. 20:31The Fight Isn't Over
  38. 21:10The Tax is Gone, Conversation Shifts
  39. 21:20Public Safety Argument Was a Front
  40. 21:27Finish the Job: Get Suppressors Off NFA
  41. 21:38Final Thoughts and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are firearm suppressors regulated under the National Firearms Act?

Firearm suppressors are regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934. The NFA imposed a $200 tax stamp on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and shotguns. Historical analysis suggests this was intended to make these items prohibitively expensive and difficult to obtain, limiting access rather than solely for revenue collection, despite their original purpose as safety devices.

What was the original purpose of firearm suppressors?

Firearm suppressors, invented by Hiram Percy Maxim in 1902, were originally intended as safety devices. They were designed to reduce the loud muzzle blast of firearms, protect the shooter's hearing, and also reduce recoil. Maxim demonstrated these benefits to the US Army over a century ago.

How do Hollywood portrayals of suppressors differ from reality?

Hollywood often depicts suppressors as making firearms nearly silent, like a whisper. In reality, suppressors only quiet the explosion of gunpowder. The supersonic crack of the bullet breaking the sound barrier remains, making suppressed firearms still loud, typically around 130-140 decibels, comparable to a jackhammer or jet engine.

Can the government be sued for hearing damage caused by suppressor regulations?

Directly suing the federal government for hearing damage caused by suppressor regulations is generally not possible due to sovereign immunity, which protects the government from being sued without its consent. While the argument for negligence can be made, legal recourse against the government is severely limited by this principle.

What changes have recently occurred regarding suppressor regulations?

As of January 1, 2026, the $200 tax stamp on suppressors and other NFA items will be eliminated. However, suppressors will remain classified as NFA items, still requiring a Form 4 submission, fingerprinting, and inclusion in a federal registry, indicating that while the tax is gone, regulatory control persists.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →