Politician Wants A Mental Health Exam To Keep Your AR-15

Published on June 14, 2026
Duration: 6:19

This video critically analyzes a US Senate candidate's proposal for mandatory five-year mental health exams and re-registration for AR-15 ownership. The analysis highlights the proposal's flawed justification, using a shotgun-related incident that his plan wouldn't have addressed. It also questions the candidate's consultation process, which involved law enforcement and a single, seemingly pre-selected gun owner, while neglecting to consult larger firearm owner organizations.

Quick Summary

A US Senate candidate proposed mandatory five-year mental health exams and re-registration for AR-15 owners, framing it as 'common sense.' However, the proposal is criticized for being based on a shotgun incident his plan wouldn't address and for consulting only law enforcement and a single gun owner, neglecting broader community input.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Senate Candidate's AR-15 Proposal
  2. 00:23Colion Noir's American Hat Merch
  3. 00:58Introducing Dan Osborne: The 'Reasonable' Candidate
  4. 01:18The Proposal: Mental Health Exams for AR-15s
  5. 01:41Justification Flaw: Shotgun Murder Incident
  6. 02:12Consultations: Police vs. Gun Owners
  7. 03:25The 'Subscription' Model of Gun Rights
  8. 03:51Conclusion: Permission vs. Right

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the proposed policy for AR-15 ownership?

A US Senate candidate proposed requiring individuals to pass a mental health exam every five years and re-register their legally owned AR-15s to continue possessing them.

What incident was used to justify the AR-15 mental health exam proposal?

The proposal was justified by a shooting incident in Crete, Nebraska, where the perpetrator used a shotgun, a firearm not covered by the candidate's proposed restrictions on AR-15s and similar rifles.

Who did the Senate candidate consult regarding his firearm proposal?

The candidate reportedly consulted law enforcement and one individual gun owner who agreed with the proposal, but did not consult larger firearm owner organizations.

How does the video critique the concept of mandatory mental health exams for gun owners?

The video argues that such proposals treat gun ownership as a revocable 'subscription' requiring government permission, rather than an inherent right, and that the justification for the exams is flawed.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →