Proposition 109 - Right to Hunt and Fish in Arizona

Published on October 20, 2010
Duration: 8:45

This video discusses Arizona's Proposition 109, a ballot initiative aimed at enshrining the right to hunt and fish in the state constitution. Todd Razzor, an NRA board member, refutes claims by HSUS that the NRA distrusts voters, emphasizing that Prop 109 is a ballot initiative itself. He explains that the amendment places limits on the legislature and the Game and Fish Commission to prevent emotional decision-making on hunting and fishing regulations, citing issues like mountain lion hunting bans and the confinement of veal calves and breeding pigs as examples of emotional tactics used by opponents. Razzor asserts that Prop 109 is designed to be enforceable and prevent emotional management of wildlife, making certain hunting bans unconstitutional.

Quick Summary

Arizona's Proposition 109 is a ballot initiative to amend the state constitution, enshrining the right to hunt and fish. It aims to limit the legislature and Game and Fish Commission, ensuring wildlife management is scientific and supports hunting/fishing, not driven by emotional issues. Opponents are accused of using unrelated controversies to fight the measure.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Proposition 109
  2. 00:15HSUS Claims and NRA Response
  3. 01:01Limits on Legislature and Commission
  4. 01:15Preventing Emotional Issues in Regulations
  5. 01:56Opponent Tactics: Cockfighting and Animal Confinement
  6. 03:36HSUS Goal: NRA of Animal Rights World
  7. 04:14HSUS Shift in Stance on Prop 109
  8. 04:41Enforceability and Impact of Prop 109
  9. 05:26NRA's Trust in Voters and Truth
  10. 06:03Comparison to 'Assault Weapon' Definitions
  11. 06:47Prop 109 as a Power Grab? Refutation
  12. 07:16How to Support Proposition 109
  13. 07:36Requesting Materials: NRA Website
  14. 08:00Requesting Materials: Southern Arizona Contact
  15. 08:24Learning the Truth about Prop 109

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Arizona's Proposition 109?

Arizona's Proposition 109 is a ballot initiative aimed at amending the state constitution to explicitly protect the right to hunt and fish. It seeks to establish clear guidelines for wildlife management, preventing emotional decision-making and ensuring regulations are based on scientific principles.

How does Proposition 109 limit the Arizona Legislature and Game and Fish Commission?

Proposition 109 places new limits on the powers of the Arizona Legislature and the Game and Fish Commission. The initiative mandates that wildlife management decisions must be scientific and further hunting and fishing, thereby restricting the ability to enact regulations based on emotional appeals or non-scientific reasoning.

What tactics are opponents using against Proposition 109?

According to NRA board member Todd Razzor, opponents like HSUS are using diversionary tactics and emotional appeals. These include bringing up unrelated issues such as cockfighting, animal confinement practices, and past controversies to incite voters against the initiative, rather than addressing the merits of Prop 109 itself.

Why is Proposition 109 considered 'enforceable'?

Proposition 109 is described as having 'teeth' and being 'ironclad' because it would make the emotional management of wildlife unconstitutional. This means that if passed, bans on certain types of hunting or other emotionally driven regulations would be legally challenged and potentially overturned.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →