Radio Host Argues Why The Second Amendment Has Nothing To Do With Protection From The Government

Published on May 12, 2024
Duration: 11:09

Colion Noir, an attorney and expert on constitutional law, debunks Thom Hartmann's claims about the Second Amendment. Noir argues that the 2A's intent is to protect citizens from government tyranny, citing the Declaration of Independence and historical legal contexts like the Dred Scott decision. He emphasizes the right of the people to bear arms for self-protection and resistance against oppression.

Quick Summary

Colion Noir argues the Second Amendment's primary intent is to protect citizens from government tyranny. He cites the Declaration of Independence's right to abolish oppressive government and historical legal contexts like the Dred Scott decision to support the broad right of the people to bear arms for self-defense and resistance.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Debunking Second Amendment Myths
  2. 01:13Intent vs. Inflammatory Titles
  3. 02:51The Right to Abolish Government
  4. 03:58Militias vs. Standing Armies
  5. 07:05The 'Slave Patrol' Argument
  6. 08:27Second Amendment and Civil Rights
  7. 09:51Keep America Tactical Message

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core purpose of the Second Amendment according to Colion Noir?

Colion Noir argues the Second Amendment's core purpose is to protect the people's right to bear arms to defend themselves and the country from potential government tyranny, a fundamental aspect of American liberty.

How does the Declaration of Independence relate to the Second Amendment?

The Declaration of Independence establishes the principle that citizens have the right to alter or abolish a government that becomes destructive of their rights. This foundational idea is seen as intrinsically linked to the Second Amendment's intent to empower the populace.

What is the 'slave patrol' argument regarding the Second Amendment?

The 'slave patrol' argument suggests the Second Amendment was primarily intended to maintain social control and suppress slave revolts. Colion Noir dismisses this as a misinterpretation designed to obscure the amendment's broader protective intent for all citizens.

What historical legal case is used to support the broad intent of the Second Amendment?

The Dred Scott decision is referenced to illustrate how the courts historically feared the implications of granting citizens the right to 'keep and carry arms,' thereby affirming the amendment's wide-reaching protective scope.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →