The ATF Just LIED to SCOTUS
This video critically analyzes the ATF's reply brief in the Vanderock v. Garland case before the Supreme Court. The speaker argues that the ATF has misrepresented the nature and complexity of 80% frames and receivers to the court, potentially for political gain. The content highlights the technical difficulties involved in completing an 80% receiver, contrasting it with the ATF's portrayal of a simple, quick process.










