VIDEO: House STARTS ILLEGAL BAN On ALL AMMO!!

Published on March 5, 2024
Duration: 25:30

This video analyzes recent US Supreme Court decisions and lower court rulings impacting Second Amendment rights, focusing on California's ammunition restrictions, magazine capacity limits, and assault weapon bans. It discusses how the Supreme Court's decision in *New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen* is influencing lower courts to re-evaluate existing gun laws based on historical tradition. The content highlights the legal arguments from both gun rights advocates and gun control organizations regarding the interpretation and application of these laws.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Gun Control Goals
  2. 00:31Ammunition Restriction Case Overview
  3. 01:13Supreme Court's Role in Gun Rights
  4. 02:08Second Amendment and Legal Standards
  5. 02:31Gun Control Advocacy Group's Stance
  6. 02:54Supreme Court Rejects San Diego Case
  7. 03:05Impact on Assault Weapon Bans
  8. 03:14Gun Control Advocates' Assertions
  9. 03:29Right to Carry Outside Home
  10. 03:33Lower Courts Re-examination
  11. 03:40Potential Loss of Firearm Use Tools
  12. 03:45Banning Weapons by Appearance
  13. 04:01Court's Conservative Majority Guidance
  14. 04:18New Guidance Application
  15. 04:249th Circuit Re-evaluation Order
  16. 04:43New Jersey Ammunition Law
  17. 04:52Hawaii and Maryland Lawsuits
  18. 05:06Right to Defend Lives
  19. 05:11Banning Assault Weapons
  20. 05:15Proposing Regulations
  21. 05:18Devices Turning Legal Weapons into Machine Guns
  22. 05:23Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge
  23. 05:299th Circuit and Assault Weapon Ban
  24. 05:3492nd Circuit Remands Case
  25. 05:46Overturning Lower Court Ruling
  26. 05:53NRA Lawsuit Against Gun Law
  27. 05:59Conservative View on Second Amendment Rights
  28. 06:05Most Important Ruling on Gun Rights
  29. 06:072008 Right to Self-Defense
  30. 06:14Expansion to States
  31. 06:19New York Concealed Carry Law
  32. 06:29Pistol Brace Functionality
  33. 06:3612-Round Magazine Example
  34. 06:43Fully Automatic Machine Gun Ban
  35. 06:46Bump Stock Ban
  36. 06:49Unrestricted Licenses
  37. 06:53Judgment on Lawful Regulations
  38. 07:00Second Amendment Lawful Regulations
  39. 07:04Traditional Restrictions
  40. 07:09New York Concealed Weapon Statute
  41. 07:12Gun Control Advocates' Concerns
  42. 07:15Invalidating Laws
  43. 07:17Untraceable Ghost Guns
  44. 07:22Criminal Background Checks
  45. 07:24Red Flag Regulations
  46. 07:32States Impacted by Decision
  47. 07:43Prohibiting Weapons in Sensitive Places
  48. 07:57New York State Rifle and Pistol Association
  49. 08:06Sensitive Places Debate
  50. 08:10Legal Challenges to Bans
  51. 08:18Maryland Assault Rifle Ban
  52. 08:22Large Capacity Ammunition Mag Bans
  53. 08:27Supreme Court Invalidation
  54. 08:29Increased Individual Gun Rights
  55. 08:36Clarifying Assessment of Restrictions
  56. 08:43Second Amendment of US Constitution
  57. 08:45Traditional Restrictions Comparison
  58. 08:52Gun Control Advocates' Concerns on Standard
  59. 08:59Legal Experts' Views
  60. 09:02Most Important Statement on Gun Rights
  61. 09:07Judicial Division and Hesitation
  62. 09:09Bruin Decision Impact
  63. 09:16Supreme Court's Criterion
  64. 09:19Historical Tradition of Firearm Regulation
  65. 09:26Delaware Ghost Gun Ban
  66. 09:30Texas Firearm Restriction
  67. 09:34Federal Ban on Gun Ownership for Young Adults
  68. 09:39Supreme Court Intervention for Guidance
  69. 09:43Legal Confusion from Decision
  70. 09:47First Significant Gun Ruling in 10 Years
  71. 09:51Safety and Gun Storage
  72. 09:55Female Safety Concerns
  73. 09:57Getting Assault Weapons Out of Wrong Hands
  74. 10:03Mass Public Shootings in Gun-Banned Areas
  75. 10:10Different Conclusions on Statutes
  76. 10:13Legal Disputes and Mass Layings
  77. 10:16Rise in Violent Crime
  78. 10:25Judicial Arguments on Second Amendment
  79. 10:31Gun Control Contentions
  80. 10:33Legislative Restrictions Application
  81. 10:38Government Failure to Present Precedent
  82. 10:47Fifth US Circuit Court of Appeals
  83. 10:50Attorney General Merrick Garland
  84. 10:55Gun Control Advocates' Counterarguments
  85. 10:57Restrictions Withstanding Challenges
  86. 11:01Unheard-of Societal Issues
  87. 11:05Technology Advancements and Nuanced Strategy
  88. 11:08Pro-Gun and Anti-Gun Monitoring
  89. 11:16Contesting State Laws
  90. 11:19Banning Semi-Auto Guns and High Capacity Mags
  91. 11:24Second Amendment and Common Use
  92. 11:30Assaulted and Shot, Couldn't Defend
  93. 11:38Gun Laws Already Invalidated
  94. 11:40Judges Deeming Parts of NY Gun Law Illegal
  95. 11:44Firearm Magazine Publisher KCI
  96. 11:48Second Amendment Lawsuit PLCAA
  97. 11:53Supreme Court Debating PLCAA Case
  98. 11:56Accountability Under PLCAA
  99. 12:04Influence on Defense Against Allegations
  100. 12:06Impact on Weapon Companies
  101. 12:15KCI Magazine Incident
  102. 12:18KCI Provider of Weapon Manuals and Mags
  103. 12:23Person Lying About Weapons
  104. 12:25Unlawful Possession
  105. 12:31KCI Request for Dismissal
  106. 12:33Magazine Meets Component Part Requirements
  107. 12:37Protections and Immunities Under PLCAA
  108. 12:43Gun Control Ultimate Goal
  109. 12:45Unarmed and Subjugated America
  110. 12:51Second Amendment: No Government Trampling
  111. 12:54KCI Magazine Standards
  112. 12:57Component Element of Firearm
  113. 13:01Eligible for Protections and Immunities
  114. 13:10Increase in Civil Liability
  115. 13:14Constitution's Framers' Intent
  116. 13:17Supreme Court Decision Favoring KCI
  117. 13:22Lower Court Case Continuation
  118. 13:26PLCAA's Primary Goal
  119. 13:29Dismissing Claims Before Trials
  120. 13:34Judge Overturns California Gun Purchase Legislation
  121. 13:37Federal Judge Blocks California Law
  122. 13:39Background Checks for Ammunition Buyers
  123. 13:44Onerous and Convoluted Regulations
  124. 13:48Violate Constitutional Right to Bear Arms
  125. 13:50US District Judge Roger Benitez
  126. 13:54San Diego Ruling
  127. 13:56California Rifle and Pistol Association
  128. 13:59Stop Checks and Restrictions on Ammo Sales
  129. 14:04Overturn Assault Weapons Ban
  130. 14:07Nothing Will Change for Foreseeable Future
  131. 14:10Years of Experimentation
  132. 14:13Casualties Counted
  133. 14:15California Ammunition Background Check Law Misfires
  134. 14:18Second Amendment Rights Gravely Injured
  135. 14:22Benitez's 120-Page Opinion
  136. 14:28Granting Preliminary Injunction
  137. 14:30Voters Approved Toughening CA Firearms Law
  138. 14:35Restrictions Took Effect
  139. 14:38New York First State for Ammunition Background Checks
  140. 14:45California First to Extend Checks to Ammo Sales
  141. 14:52Other States Requiring Background Checks
  142. 14:58Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey
  143. 15:02Licenses for Firearms or Ammunition
  144. 15:04Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
  145. 15:07Hannah Shear's Statement
  146. 15:11Dangerous Step in Wrong Direction
  147. 15:14Increased Sales Due to Coronavirus Concerns
  148. 15:20Society or Safety Worries
  149. 15:23Lost Red Tape and Database Errors
  150. 15:27Law-Abiding Californians Unable to Purchase Ammunition
  151. 15:30Sport or Self-Defense
  152. 15:32Chuck Mitchell, Association's General Counsel
  153. 15:37Flimsy Reason for Constitutional Infringements
  154. 15:41Inadequate Justification
  155. 15:43State Expected to Appeal Ruling
  156. 15:48Californians Sleep Easier
  157. 15:50Constitutional Rights Restored and Strengthened
  158. 15:54Governor Gavin Newsom Champions Law
  159. 15:57Administration Disappointed by Decision
  160. 16:02Considering Next Steps
  161. 16:07California's Strong Gun Safety Law
  162. 16:09Keeping Schools and Communities Safe
  163. 16:14State Attorney General's Office Reviewing Decision
  164. 16:16Appeal or Stay Order
  165. 16:20Order Takes Effect Immediately
  166. 16:22California Gun Stores Ordered Shut Due to Coronavirus
  167. 16:25Not Deemed Essential Businesses
  168. 16:30Los Angeles and San Jose
  169. 16:33Same Judge's Decision Last Year
  170. 16:36Striking Down Ban on High Capacity Magazines
  171. 16:38Week-Long Buying Frenzy
  172. 16:43Halted Sales During Appeal
  173. 16:45Gun Owners Rushed to Stockpile Ammunition
  174. 16:51Before New Restrictions Took Effect
  175. 16:53Benitez Called Ammunition Law Onerous
  176. 16:56Constitutionally Defective
  177. 17:01Criminals, Tyrants, Terrorists Don't Do Background Checks
  178. 17:04Background Check Experiment Defies Common Sense
  179. 17:08Severely Burdening Second Amendment Rights
  180. 17:11Responsible Gun Owning Citizen
  181. 17:13Lawfully Buy Ammunition
  182. 17:15Intended to Keep Ammunition from Criminals
  183. 17:18Blocked Sales to Legitimate Buyers
  184. 17:22About 16% of the Time
  185. 17:25State's Ban and Importing Ammunition
  186. 17:29Violates Federal Interstate Commerce Laws
  187. 17:35Attorney General Xavier Becerra
  188. 17:38Court Filing This Month
  189. 17:40Background Check Stopped Illegal Bullet Purchases
  190. 17:45July 2019 Through January 2020
  191. 17:51Those Who Didn't Even Try
  192. 17:53Law Requires Eligibility Check
  193. 17:56State's Firearm Background Check Database
  194. 17:58Pay $1 Fee Per Ammunition Purchase
  195. 18:04Longer Term Licenses
  196. 18:07No Certain Criminal Convictions or Mental Health Commitments
  197. 18:11Average Time for Background Checks
  198. 18:13Less Than 5 Minutes
  199. 18:14State Court Filings
  200. 18:17No Substantial Impediment
  201. 18:20State Argument in Court Documents
  202. 18:22Eligibility Check Delays Purchase
  203. 18:27Few Minutes Delay
  204. 18:30Benitez Ruled Ammunition Law Illegally Locks Out-of-State Vendors
  205. 18:34Conflicts with Federal Law
  206. 18:37Allowing Gun Owners to Bring Firearms and Ammunition Through California
  207. 18:43Lawsuit by California Rifle and Pistol Association
  208. 18:46Joined by Out-of-State Sellers and CA Residents
  209. 18:50Kim Road, Olympic Shooting Medals
  210. 18:53California's Road Bond Ammunition Restriction Case
  211. 18:58Cases California Gun Owners Have Waited For
  212. 19:08Hearing in Front of Judge Roger T Benitez
  213. 19:10Additional Things Developed
  214. 19:15New Things Being Filed in Road Case
  215. 19:20Many of You Have Been Asking Me About
  216. 19:22Road Case Update
  217. 19:26If You're Not Aware
  218. 19:29Road Bond Deals with California Restrictions
  219. 19:31Purchase of Ammunition
  220. 19:33Background Check System
  221. 19:37Eligibility Check to Purchase Ammunition
  222. 19:41Provision Passed Through Proposition 63
  223. 19:43Purchasers Undergo Background Check Systems
  224. 19:48Confirm Legal Purchase and Possession
  225. 19:55Basic Eligibility Check
  226. 19:58Standard Eligibility Check
  227. 20:00Different Fees
  228. 20:02Law Restricts Ammunition Purchase Online
  229. 20:05Have It Sent Directly to Home
  230. 20:10All Ammunition Purchases Must Go Through FFL
  231. 20:14Federal Firearms License
  232. 20:17Ammunition Restrictions Challenged in Road V. Bolton Case
  233. 20:23Road V. Bolton Case
  234. 20:27Similar to What We've Seen in the Past
  235. 20:30Appellant Court in the Ninth Circuit
  236. 20:32Remanded the Case Back
  237. 20:35Most Robust Far-Reaching Gun Law in History
  238. 20:38It Is Not
  239. 20:40Judge Roger T Benitez Originally Reviewed Case
  240. 20:42Utilized Version of Text Informed by History and Tradition
  241. 20:45Reach His Original Decision
  242. 20:47Described Test as Simple Heller Test
  243. 20:51Heller Asks Whether Law Bans Types of Arms Commonly Used for Lawful Purposes
  244. 20:57Simply a Hardware Test
  245. 21:02Using Simple Heller Test
  246. 21:05Obvious California Background Check Laws
  247. 21:07De Facto Block Law-Abiding Citizens
  248. 21:09Buying Common Ammunition
  249. 21:14Unconstitutional
  250. 21:16Under Heller Test Review Could End
  251. 21:18First Step, No Need to Go Further
  252. 21:22Original Order
  253. 21:25Ammunition Background Check Has No Historical Pedigree
  254. 21:29Required Each Time Ammunition is Purchased
  255. 21:33Never Been Implemented Ever Before
  256. 21:37Bonitz Did Exactly What Supreme Court Said
  257. 21:40Even Before Supreme Court Issued Decisions
  258. 21:44New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Versus Bruin
  259. 21:46Updates on Restriction Case
  260. 21:49Benitez Used Text Informed by History and Tradition
  261. 21:52California Ammunition Restriction is Invalid
  262. 21:57Road Along with Other Two-Way Cases
  263. 22:02Sent Back Down to Lower Courts
  264. 22:04Reconsideration in Light of Bruin
  265. 22:07December Conference Held
  266. 22:10Multiple California Cases
  267. 22:12Road, Duncan, and Miller Cases
  268. 22:15Judge Benitez Requested Additional Spreadsheets and Historical Evidence
  269. 22:18Needed to Be Submitted to Him and Court
  270. 22:22Using Analysis in Bruin
  271. 22:24Demonstrate Other Historic Analogues
  272. 22:26Required Under Bruin
  273. 22:30District Court Used Balancing Test on Public Interest
  274. 22:34People Thought Federal Government Would Never Get Gun Law Bill Passed
  275. 22:36Got One Done in Last Year
  276. 22:39Rather Than New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Versus Bruin Test
  277. 22:41Since February Most Cases Silent
  278. 22:46Miller, Duncan, and Rh Cases
  279. 22:49Judge Benitez Brought Road Back Out of Holding Pattern
  280. 22:55Holding Consolidated Hearing
  281. 22:57Additional Timelines for Information Submission
  282. 23:01Finally Decide This Case
  283. 23:03Orders of Judge Benitez
  284. 23:06Additional 75 Days to Parties
  285. 23:09Submit Additional Declarations and Evidence
  286. 23:12Support Each Side's Position
  287. 23:14Judge Benitez Gave Plaintiffs Ability to Submit Declarations
  288. 23:17Show They Have Standing
  289. 23:20State of California Additional Time
  290. 23:23Submit Reports and Declarations from Experts
  291. 23:26Show American History and Tradition of Restrictions
  292. 23:28On Ammunition Purchases
  293. 23:30Validates Background Check System and Ammunition Restriction
  294. 23:33Restriction on Purchasing Online and Home Delivery
  295. 23:37No Full Decision Until October
  296. 23:40Additional Documents Submitted
  297. 23:43Declarations from Plaintiffs Received
  298. 23:46Prove They Have Standing
  299. 23:48California Submitted Additional Evidence
  300. 23:50Support Ammunition Restrictions
  301. 23:52Declarations of Plaintiffs
  302. 23:53Road Ammunition Case Update
  303. 23:56Road Submitted Declaration
  304. 23:59Clearly Has Standing to Sue
  305. 24:01Olympic Trap Shooting Competitor
  306. 24:04Law Impacts Her Directly
  307. 24:06Update in Road Case
  308. 24:08Documents Submitted in Road Case
  309. 24:10Main Takeaways
  310. 24:13Additional Briefs and Responses Due October 7th
  311. 24:16Waiting Game Until After October 7th
  312. 24:19Judge Benitez Will Issue Decision
  313. 24:22California Will Continue Efforts to Postpone
  314. 24:25Lawsuit Road and Other Two-Way Cases
  315. 24:28Predestined to be Heard by Ninth Circuit
  316. 24:31Likely Proceed Through Procedure
  317. 24:34Heard by Supreme Court
  318. 24:37End of Video

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Best Iron

View all →