Copper Showdown!...Defiant vs Barnes .380 Auto Self-Defense AMMO Test!

Published on August 11, 2023
Duration: 13:24

This video provides a detailed ballistic comparison between Barnes Tac-XPD and Defiant Munitions TCX .380 Auto self-defense ammunition, fired through a Ruger LCP Max with a heavy clothing barrier. The test utilizes Clear Ballistics gel and a Lab Radar Chronograph to measure velocity, penetration, and expansion. The Defiant Munitions TCX demonstrated superior performance in all tested metrics, achieving significant expansion and meeting FBI minimum penetration standards, while the Barnes Tac-XPD failed to expand and fell short of penetration requirements.

Quick Summary

In a .380 Auto ballistic test with a heavy clothing barrier, Defiant Munitions TCX 80-grain ammunition achieved 12.5 inches of penetration with excellent expansion. The Barnes Tac-XPD 80-grain failed to expand, tumbled, and only penetrated 10.5 inches, making the Defiant Munitions the superior choice for self-defense.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Setup
  2. 00:11Copper .380 Battle: Defiant vs Barnes
  3. 00:15Ballistics Gel and Clothing Barrier Setup
  4. 00:33Ammunition Overview: Barnes Tac-XPD
  5. 00:58Ammunition Overview: Defiant Munitions TCX
  6. 01:16Firearm: Ruger LCP Max with M-Carbo Mods
  7. 02:47Velocity Testing: Barnes Tac-XPD
  8. 04:13Velocity Testing: Defiant Munitions TCX
  9. 05:35Gel Test: Barnes Tac-XPD
  10. 06:15Gel Test: Defiant Munitions TCX
  11. 06:43Gel Test Results Analysis
  12. 07:03Barnes Tac-XPD Performance Breakdown
  13. 07:39Defiant Munitions TCX Performance Breakdown
  14. 08:03Penetration Depth Comparison
  15. 08:36Overhead Gel Test View
  16. 09:07Projectile Examination
  17. 10:14Projectile Weight Analysis
  18. 10:29Expansion Diameter Comparison
  19. 10:53Final Verdict: .380 Copper Battle
  20. 11:21Conclusion: Defiant Munitions Dominates
  21. 12:04Price vs. Performance Discussion
  22. 12:30Where to Find Defiant Munitions
  23. 12:41Viewer Engagement and Call to Action
  24. 13:10Appreciation and Future Content

Frequently Asked Questions

How did Defiant Munitions TCX .380 Auto perform in a ballistic gel test with a clothing barrier?

The Defiant Munitions TCX .380 Auto 80-grain ammunition achieved approximately 12.5 inches of penetration in ballistic gel after passing through a heavy clothing barrier. It demonstrated excellent, symmetrical expansion, meeting FBI minimum penetration standards and showing significant disruption.

What were the results for Barnes Tac-XPD .380 Auto in the same ballistic test?

The Barnes Tac-XPD .380 Auto 80-grain ammunition failed to expand when fired through the heavy clothing barrier and ballistic gel. It tumbled, achieved only 10.5 inches of penetration, and remained intact without any deformation, indicating a failure to perform as a self-defense round under these conditions.

What was the average velocity difference between the Defiant Munitions TCX and Barnes Tac-XPD .380 Auto from a short barrel?

From a 2.75-inch barrel, the Defiant Munitions TCX averaged 1082 FPS, while the Barnes Tac-XPD averaged 971 FPS. The Defiant Munitions round was approximately 111 FPS faster, contributing to its superior performance in expansion and penetration.

Which .380 Auto ammunition is recommended for self-defense based on this test?

Based on this ballistic test simulating self-defense scenarios with a clothing barrier, the Defiant Munitions TCX .380 Auto is highly recommended due to its consistent expansion, adequate penetration, and higher velocity compared to the Barnes Tac-XPD, which failed to expand.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Tools&Targets

View all →